echocardiology.org

Tutorial

Tricuspid Atresia

Absent AV connection vs. imperforate valve, the Tandon-Edwards classification with type-specific therapy, and the staged Fontan pathway.

Published . Last reviewed .

Tricuspid atresia accounts for roughly 1–2% of congenital heart disease and is one of the classic causes of functionally univentricular (“single ventricle”) circulation — one where a single dominant ventricle handles both systemic and pulmonary output, ultimately requiring Fontan-pathway palliation.

What “Tricuspid Atresia” Actually Means Anatomically

It’s worth being precise here, since the common name is genuinely misleading about the underlying anatomy. The classic, common form of tricuspid atresia is not an imperforate valve at all — it’s complete absence of the right atrioventricular connection itself. The right atrial floor is entirely muscular tissue, separated from the ventricular mass below by the fibrofatty tissue of the atrioventricular groove. There is no valve tissue present to begin with, because there’s no connection for a valve to guard.

A genuinely different, much rarer entity exists: an imperforate tricuspid valve, where actual valve tissue is present (sometimes with a hypoplastic tension apparatus visible on its ventricular aspect, and the membrane characteristically ballooning into the ventricle during atrial systole) but doesn’t allow flow. This occurs with concordant, biventricular connections — each atrium still connects to its own ventricle — typically in association with Ebstein’s malformation of the tricuspid valve. Critically, this variant does not by itself produce single-ventricle physiology the way absent AV connection does, even though the hemodynamic picture at birth can look superficially similar (obstructed right heart inflow). Getting this distinction right matters for both prognosis and the surgical pathway.

Absence of an atrioventricular connection, together with double-inlet ventricle, is what defines a univentricular atrioventricular connection — the atria connect, in total, to only one ventricular chamber, in contrast to the great majority of hearts where each atrium has its own ventricle.

Ventricular Morphology

The dominant, systemic ventricle — nearly always a morphologic left ventricle — has a smooth septal surface, with the mitral valve in fibrous continuity with the aortic valve. The rudimentary right ventricle lacks its inlet component entirely; it’s better understood as a small infundibular outlet chamber than as simply a “small RV.” This outlet chamber connects to the dominant ventricle only through a restrictive outflow foramen, which functions much like a VSD and is frequently the dominant determinant of how much blood reaches the pulmonary circulation (in normally related great arteries) or the systemic circulation (when the great arteries are transposed — see below).

A practical echocardiographic technique — the “hand rule” — identifies ventricular looping from the apical four-chamber view: if only a left hand can be mentally fitted to the dominant ventricle’s septal wall and outlet chamber position, it’s a D-loop (usual, solitus) ventricle; if only a right hand fits, it’s an L-loop (inverted) ventricle. The two appear as mirror images of one another. The side of the deep, echo-lucent atrioventricular groove — where the absent connection sits — identifies which side’s tricuspid valve is functionally atretic.

The Tandon-Edwards Classification

Rather than the loose “increased vs. decreased pulmonary blood flow” framing sometimes used informally, tricuspid atresia has a specific, widely-used classification (Tandon and Edwards, 1974) that organizes by great artery relationship first, then by pulmonary outflow anatomy — and each specific combination carries its own initial management, not one generic pathway:

TypeGreat arteriesSubtypeVSD/outflow foramenPulmonary outflowOtherInitial therapy
INormally related (concordant)ANoneAtresia—Systemic-pulmonary shunt or PDA stent
IBSmallStenosis—Variable, depends on PS degree
ICLargeUnobstructed—Pulmonary artery band
IID-transposition (discordant)AUsually largeAtresia—Systemic-pulmonary shunt or PDA stent
IIBVariableStenosis—Variable
IICOften smallUnobstructedSystemic outflow obstructionStage 1 Norwood-type procedure
IIIComplex (including L-loop ventricles)VariableVariableIndividualized

The Type II-C combination is worth understanding specifically: with transposed great arteries, a small outflow foramen becomes a systemic outflow obstruction rather than a pulmonary one (since the foramen now sits between the dominant ventricle and the vessel supplying the body) — which is why this specific combination needs a Norwood-type approach rather than the shunt or banding strategies used for the other subtypes.

Pathophysiology

An adequate interatrial communication (a large ASD or PFO) is essential, allowing systemic venous blood from the right atrium to reach the left atrium and, from there, the dominant ventricle — without it, systemic venous return has nowhere to go. From the dominant ventricle, blood splits to both the systemic circulation directly and, via the outflow foramen (± a VSD or PDA), to the pulmonary circulation — the dominant ventricle handles the combined systemic and pulmonary output, producing chronic volume overload, the hemodynamic essence of single-ventricle physiology. Pulmonary blood flow depends on the size of the outflow foramen/VSD, the degree of any associated pulmonary stenosis or atresia, and (when severe) a patent ductus arteriosus — a ductal-dependent circulation in the most restrictive cases.

In L-loop (inverted) ventricular morphology specifically, creating an atrial septal defect is essential in most patients — not just helpful — to treat or prevent pulmonary venous hypertension, a distinct practical consideration from the more common D-loop form, where the existing interatrial communication is more often sufficient on its own (occasional prophylactic septostomy is considered based on foramen ovale size and the presence of an atrial septal aneurysm, though this isn’t needed in most D-loop patients).

Associated Anomalies

  • Transposition of the great arteries — defines Type II in the classification above, and materially changes both the physiology (small outflow foramen = systemic obstruction, not pulmonary) and the surgical approach.
  • Coarctation of the aorta — a recognized association, particularly alongside a restrictive outflow foramen in transposed-great-artery physiology, often requiring arch reconstruction alongside the primary procedure.
  • Pulmonary stenosis or atresia — frequently present, and central to the classification’s B/A subtypes.
  • See Atrial Septal Defect, Ventricular Septal Defect, and Patent Ductus Arteriosus for the isolated-lesion pictures of the shunt pathways this condition depends on.

Clinical Findings

Cyanosis is typically present from birth, with severity tracking pulmonary blood flow — more severe with associated pulmonary atresia or severe stenosis, less severe (but with a greater risk of pulmonary overcirculation and heart failure) with a large, unrestricted outflow foramen. Fatigue with feeding or exertion and tachypnea from chronic hypoxemia are typical.

Echocardiographic Findings

The initial exam is typically performed in utero or in the neonatal period, and multiplane and 3D imaging are essential for a complete, accurate diagnosis — this anatomy is genuinely three-dimensional in a way that a single view or plane can’t fully capture.

A Systematic, View-by-View Approach

  • Subxiphoid views provide the single best overview of the heart, and are the primary window for diagnosing situs, the atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial alignments, and the connections themselves. These views also give excellent images of the systemic and pulmonary veins, the atria, the atrial septum, the AV valve(s), and the ventricle(s) — and are specifically the best views for appreciating unusual ventricular positioning, which matters given the range of looping and dominance patterns possible in this condition. Subxiphoid (and parasternal short-axis) views also show the interatrial communication and the communication between the dominant ventricle and the infundibular outlet chamber, and typically afford a favorable low-angle approach for spectral Doppler across the semilunar valve roots as well.
  • Apical views are used to examine and measure the AV valve, and to interrogate the semilunar valve arising from the dominant ventricle. They also provide one dimension (apex-to-base) of the outflow foramen or VSD.
  • Parasternal long-axis views usually provide the best angle for assessing the gradient across the connection between the dominant ventricle and the outlet chamber, or across a VSD — genuinely useful, since this gradient is frequently what determines pulmonary or systemic flow depending on great artery relationship. This view also gives semilunar valve diameters (ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk) and allows assessment of semilunar valve function.
  • Parasternal short-axis views provide a dimension of the AV valve orthogonal to the one obtained from apical views, and show semilunar valve morphology. A specific, practical measurement technique worth knowing: combining the apical four-chamber view’s apex-to-base dimension of the outflow foramen with the parasternal short-axis view’s left-to-right dimension of that same structure gives a genuinely more accurate assessment of its true cross-sectional size than either view alone — useful since this outflow foramen is often non-circular. At the level of the aortic root, the parasternal short-axis view also shows coronary artery anatomy.
  • Suprasternal and high parasternal views are the best vantage points for evaluating the aortic arch, isthmus, branch pulmonary arteries, and ductus arteriosus, including color and spectral Doppler interrogation of each — particularly relevant given the coarctation association discussed above. See Coarctation of the Aorta for the broader arch-imaging approach this builds on.

A genuine caveat about function assessment: standard echocardiographic techniques for quantifying systolic function — 2D-derived volumes and ejection fraction, and even myocardial velocity or strain imaging — have uncertain validity in a functionally single, often unusually-shaped ventricle, and correlation with other established function parameters has been inconsistent in some studies. 3D echocardiography adds valuable depth perception and spatial appreciation, but has also been shown to systematically underestimate end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction by roughly 10% compared with cardiac MRI in functionally single-ventricle hearts — worth knowing before treating a single 3D-derived EF as definitive, particularly when tracking a patient serially over time.

How to Actually Diagnose It: A Practical Sequence

Putting the anatomy above into a working diagnostic sequence:

  1. Confirm the absent right atrioventricular connection directly, most reliably from subxiphoid and apical views — look for a thick, echo-dense band of fibrofatty tissue in the region of the right AV groove, with no discernible valve tissue. This is the key distinguishing feature from a genuinely imperforate valve, which instead shows an actual membrane (sometimes ballooning into the ventricle) and occurs with a completely different connection pattern (concordant, biventricular).
  2. Determine ventricular looping using the “hand rule” described above, combined with the smooth septal surface and mitral-to-semilunar-valve fibrous continuity that identify the dominant left ventricle — best appreciated from subxiphoid views specifically.
  3. Assess the interatrial communication’s size deliberately — an inadequate ASD/PFO is physiologically critical, not an incidental finding, since it’s the only route for systemic venous return to reach the dominant ventricle.
  4. Characterize the outflow foramen or VSD — size (using the orthogonal apical/parasternal short-axis technique above), and the Doppler-estimated gradient across it, since this is frequently the rate-limiting step for either pulmonary or systemic flow depending on great artery relationship.
  5. Document great artery relationship (concordant vs. discordant) and pulmonary outflow anatomy together — this combination is what determines Tandon-Edwards type, and from there, the initial management pathway.
  6. Use color Doppler to confirm shunt directions: right-to-left across the atrial septum (RA to LA), and across the outflow foramen/VSD toward whichever circulation — pulmonary or systemic — depends on it given the great artery arrangement.

Treatment Considerations

Initial management follows directly from Tandon-Edwards type, as in the table above — a systemic-pulmonary shunt or ductal stent for pulmonary atresia, pulmonary artery banding for unobstructed pulmonary flow (to prevent overcirculation and preserve pulmonary vascular resistance ahead of later Fontan physiology), or a Norwood-type approach for the Type II-C combination with systemic outflow obstruction.

Long-term management is staged Fontan palliation:

  1. A bidirectional cavopulmonary (Glenn) anastomosis, connecting the SVC directly to the pulmonary arteries, typically performed around 4–6 months of age (some patients with sufficient native pulmonary blood flow can avoid earlier intervention entirely until this stage).
  2. Fontan completion, typically at 1–2 years of age, connecting the remaining systemic venous return (from the IVC) to the pulmonary arteries — most commonly via a lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit today, bypassing the right ventricle entirely.

Adult Follow-Up and Fontan Physiology

Adults with tricuspid atresia are, by definition, Fontan patients, and their follow-up centers on Fontan-specific surveillance rather than the original lesion itself. Modern Fontan connections use an IVC-to-pulmonary-artery pathway (lateral tunnel or extracardiac) combined with the earlier bidirectional Glenn; an older RA-to-pulmonary- artery connection, often with substantial right atrial enlargement, is still occasionally encountered in adults who had their Fontan performed under earlier surgical eras. TEE is often needed for adequate anatomic visualization of the Fontan pathway, though TTE may be sufficient for Doppler flow pattern assessment. Recognized late complications include baffle obstruction, interatrial shunting, and thrombus formation — all of which warrant deliberate, systematic screening at follow-up rather than opportunistic discovery.

Assessment of a functionally univentricular heart draws on the same systematic, view-by-view discipline used for Pulmonary Venous Anomalies — tracing each vein and each systemic connection individually rather than assuming a normal pattern.

Clinical Importance

Tricuspid atresia’s course is shaped as much by its specific anatomic subtype (great artery relationship, outflow foramen size, degree of pulmonary obstruction) as by the diagnosis itself, since each combination follows a genuinely different initial management pathway before converging on staged Fontan palliation. See Tetralogy of Fallot for another RVOT-obstruction lesion with its own multilevel obstruction pattern, and Right Ventricle Evaluation for the broader picture of RV morphology assessment this rudimentary-chamber anatomy sits alongside.

References

  1. 1. Ho SY, Rigby ML, Anderson RH. Hearts with Univentricular Atrioventricular Connections. In: Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease Made Simple. Singapore: World Scientific; 2005.
  2. 2. Hearts with Functional Single Ventricle, Superior-Inferior Ventricles, and Crisscross Heart. In: Lai WW, Mertens LL, Cohen MS, Geva T, eds. Echocardiography in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: From Fetus to Adult. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2022.
  3. 3. Adult Congenital Heart Disease With Prior Surgical Repair. In: Lang RM, Khandheria BK, Goldstein SA, Kronzon I, Saric M, Mor-Avi V, eds. ASE's Comprehensive Echocardiography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2021.
  4. 4. Otto CM. The Adult With Congenital Heart Disease. In: Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2022.
  5. 5. Tandon R, Edwards JE. Tricuspid Atresia: A Re-Evaluation and Classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1974;67(4):530-542.